Newsworthy end-times signs and the real reason for great
anticipation.
Of all the news stories from the past couple of weeks posted
and tweeted by prophecy followers, none has caused my heart to skip a beat. The
significance of Netanyahu’s win. I read that our president doesn’t love Israel.
Blood moons. Human gene editing. ISIS. Nukes in North Korea. I got a good look
at the new Prime Minister of Greece. Some people think he’s the big A-C. He’s
an Assyrian descendant ruling in the former Greco-Roman Empire, and his swift uprising
and appeal have people talking.
But he’s really not someone we can point to and declare,
“The end is near!” As for the other notable reports, I assumed the guy in North
Korea would engineer himself some nukes, or at least claim he had. The science
of remaking the human race is not news to me—my fiction is built on that frighteningly
real possibility. If not for the furious speed of communication, I wouldn’t
know the moon was having issues. I haven’t seen any sign of it in sunny
Florida. The president doesn’t love Israel? Whaaaat? As for the political win
in the Promised Land, I’m glad the man is still standing. God be with him.
None of these matters are any more notable than the
multitude of happenings during the last several years. Or the last decades or
centuries. Or millennia. The most important indicator of “the end” was a brief
statement spoken by the Promised Messiah who died, then showed up alive again. Some
sixty years after His death on the cross, he gave a message to John the Revelator.
And to the world.
“I am coming soon.”
Since those four words were declared two thousand years ago,
they shouldn’t cause any fluctuation in the rhythm of our collective hearts
today. Right? What did the God of the universe who never makes a mistake or
gets held up in doing anything at the perfect time mean by soon?
Some modern translations replace
“soon” with “quickly.” A study of adverb/verb usage in the New Testament clearly
indicates Jesus was not saying, “I’ll see you next month.” Rather, he was
saying, “I will show up suddenly.” This is a statement to kick start the
apathetic heart.
The last church rebuked by Jesus in the book of the Revelation
was the church of Laodicea—an actual church at the time of the writing, which had
fallen into an apathetic pattern. But the scripture, according to most New
Testament scholars, also refers to the last church age—the age of apathy. This
doesn’t mean
every church and every Christian is apathetic about all aspects of
their faith. But the representation is there, and our age-aligned propensity
toward indifference is irrefutable. Wealth and enlightenment have dissolved
into poverty and blindness, just as Jesus said they would (Rev. 3:17).
And what
does this condition of the church come to at its end? A state of being
lukewarm. Under committed. Apathetic. The words of Jesus were spoken for all
ages, but was He specifically addressing the Church of Perpetual Laziness when
He declared his arrival would happen soon…quickly …suddenly? With little
warning? We’ve been on notice for two thousand years, but somebody’s going to
get taken by surprise.
How long is the age of Laodicea? Only God knows. When will
the long-awaited, forewarned, plenty-of-time-to-get-ready event suddenly
happen? Sooner or later. Why does that
make my heart skip a beat? Because it’s an indisputable proclamation about the
Second Coming. Because it’s closer today than it was yesterday. And because I
need a little cardiac arrhythmia to pull me out of my lethargic,
stand-around-and-wait-for-it mindset. Sometimes I can feel my sluggish feet
sinking into the dull ground of Laodicea. But I think I’d rather be dancing
when “soon” happens.
Poor and wretched company I keep
And keeping brings me closer to unmoving
Shake the burdened dirt from off my feet
For dancing keeps me ready for His coming
Suddenly He’ll come if I am standing
still or dancing
But dancing keeps me ready for His coming
Nicely said. Are you a dispensationalist? We are nearing 2000 years after Jesus death. Do you think the Jew's return to Israel in '48 is important? Should we be reading the signs of the times?
ReplyDelete